Two Men Behind Armenian-Turkish Football Dialogue
While Armenia’s president Serge Sargsyan and his Turkish counterpart Abdullah Gul are making history with joining hands at an unprecedented sports match between their countries on September 6, 2008, the two men behind this football dialogue may be U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama and assassinated Armenian-Turkish journalist Hrant Dink.
Image: Rakel Dink, widow of the slain Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink, accompanied by her son Arat Dink in the background, looks at his husband’s picture at the headquarters of Agos newspaper in Istanbul, Turkey, Friday, Sept. 5, 2008. Turkey and Armenia are hoping football diplomacy will help them overcome decades of antagonism rooted in Ottoman-era genocide of Armenians. Turkish President Abdullah Gul travels to Armenia on Saturday to attend a football match between the two historic foes, becoming the first Turkish leader to set foot in Armenia since the ex-Soviet nation declared independence in 1991. (AP Photo/Ibrahim Usta)
Both an opportunity for economic boost for landlocked Armenia and an opportunity for restoring international image for Turkey, the football match between the two in Yerevan couldn’t have taken place two years ago. And while many Armenians and Turks on both sides may be angry over this football dialogue due to the issue of the Armenian genocide – that exact experience of extermination, fight for recognition and institutionalized denial is what brings Dink and Obama to the stadium.
Hrant Dink, who was assassinated in Istanbul by a young Turkish ultra-nationalist in January 2007, campaigned for Armenian-Turkish reconciliation. His death, followed by some of the largest marches in Turkey’s history, showed much of the Turkey’s society that there is possibility for Armenians to be victim in Turkey. It also showed to Armenians that Turks are capable, yet not necessarily ready, of recognizing wrongs in their history.
A while ago I wondered whether Hrant Dink’s death would be the icebreaker in the Armenian-Turkish dialogue, and it seems that Hrant Dink did pave the path to Yerevan’s soccer stadium.
While Dink likely never met Barack Obama, the U.S. presidential candidate has his hands in this football dialogue as well – even though he may be completely unaware of it. Obama’s pronounced and unprecedented support for the recognition of the Armenian genocide worries Turks. He has spoken on the genocide on several occasions, including making an official statement and standing up to nationalist Azeri journalists in Baku.
While Obama’s candidacy was first met with fierce reaction in Turkey, now more moderate articles support his general approach in dealing with the world. Turkish diplomats have seem to have admitted that America might have a principled politician who will speak unreservedly on the Armenian genocide, but they also have to do everything to compel Obama to do otherwise.
Don’t get me wrong – not all Turks deny the Armenian genocide out of hatred toward Armenians. Turkey’s president Gul, I am quite convinced, would recognize the Armenian genocide if he could afford that. But his moderate presidency is on shaky grounds in a country where fascist ultra-nationalist sentiment is more than half of the time a conventional mood.
Gul will argue to Obama that he is doing his best to reconcile with Armenia, and an official recognition by the United States would jeopardize the process. The football dialogue, Gul will point to, was a huge risk to take (and it is). For the sake of the ultimate benefit of Armenia, recognizing the genocide at a time when nationalist sentiment is high in Turkey – Gul will argue – is poor judgment.
Whether Obama will stay an inspiration for today’s football dialogue or also become a victim of that match on April 24 is difficult to say. His running mate Joe Biden says Armenia has no better friends than the Vice Presidential nominee, but principles are not as firm in politics as in soccer.
One person who died for his principles, Hrant Dink, would have been happy and worried with the football dialogue. As one Turkish columnist points out, Gul’s visit to Yerevan is, in a way, tribute to Dink.
3 Responses to “Two Men Behind Armenian-Turkish Football Dialogue”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
proc on 07 Sep 2008 at 2:31 am #
I don’t think that your observations and thoughts are true. I wonder why you think just two people would be responsible for a rapproachement of two states: there are far more important reasons than two persons in general for such a decision to be made. If you insist to makeup such a short and handy (and very American i must say) list I think you chose the wrong person.
Obama has nothing to do with this, nor do I believe Obama would really mean drastic change of the American policy regarding this issue, especially not after August 7th.
The two persons you would need to note on that list for both Turkey and Armenia, if you had to make one, are Putin and Hrant Dink. The first one because he is the one who forces to rethink the influence-sphere and security of Turkey as Turkey certainly will not accept an extension of the influence-sphere of Russia (on the contrary) nor any direct and/or indirect threats to its security. The second would be Hrant Dink as he has shown to the Turkish people what unfortunate events an unbridled and wrong nationalism can cause.
Putin has also shown the Armenian leadership how precarious and costly the current unresolved situation regarding the relations between the two states is. Hrant Dink has shown the Armenian people that the Turks care about the fate of their fellow-citizen Turks from Armenian descent.
Putin is also the main reason why the Azeri support of resolving the Karabag issue through peaceful diplomatic ways has gained speed.
I don’t know why you seem to think that an American presidential nominee would make such a profound difference on the way a key sovereign regional ally with the second largest standing army of NATO, would define its relations with a small neighbour with a territorial-area which is about 3.81% of its own territorial-area.
Blogian on 07 Sep 2008 at 5:11 am #
proc, I agree with you that this match is not the work of just two men. I simply wanted to talk two of two of the men who had indirect influence on the match. Yes, Putin and Medvedev have approved – if not even suggested – the invitation. And the United States is extremely excited, as I reported last month in my private interview with the acting Ambassador, about the whole thing as well (and it might have been a suggestion by them). You could also argue that Levon Ter-Petrosyan also influenced this – Serge is trying to bring change to please the international community and show Armenia’s society that he cares about them. Again, I simply chose to write about two men who had indirect influence on the match. Obama’s presidential campaign has had influence on Gul’s decision – there is no doubt in my mind about that and I think I made a good case for it in my post. Thanks, Simon.
Ragan on 21 Sep 2008 at 9:31 am #
Thanks a ton for your work, and it is too bad I had not stumbled across your blog earlier. It is wonderful to find a blog project so sustained.